Satish Pal v. Karan Singh Sisodia
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissed appeal for non-prosecution as neither party appeared before the court despite notices, indicating the appellant's lack of desire to pursue the matter.
Dismissed appeal for non-prosecution as neither party appeared before the court despite notices, indicating the appellant's lack of desire to pursue the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
versus
KARAN SINGH SISODIA ..... Respondent
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R % 06.05.2024
No one appeared on behalf of the respondent
As per the office report, the notice could not be issued to respondent as PF was not filed on behalf of the appellant.
No one appeared on behalf of the appellant either to take passover or an adjournment when the matter was called.
On the last occasion also i.e. 7th November, 2023, there was no appearance on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant does not wish to pursue this matter further.
Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
MAY 6, 2024 gs/da
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/05/2024 at 11:51:51
Satish Pal
Karan Singh Sisodia
Chandra Dhar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court