Jile Singh v. Suresh
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal in RFA 200/2010 withdrawn by legal heir of the appellant pursuant to a notarised settlement agreement between the parties. Court permitted withdrawal, bound the parties to the settlement, and directed the decree be modified accordingly.
What the court decided
$~44
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- RFA 200/2010
- JILE SINGH .....Appellant
Through: Mr. F. K. Jha and Mr. Gaurav Jha, Advs.
versus
SURESH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarun Verma, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 21.10.2024
CM APPL. 61878/2024 (Ex.)
- Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
- Application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 61877/2024 (filed on behalf of LR of the appellant seeking withdrawal of the aforesaid RFA on the basis of settlement)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal could be withdrawn on the basis of a voluntary settlement between the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jile Singh
- respondent
Suresh
Coram
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court