Appeal against an order concerning restoration of possession of property; appellants did not appear and the appeal was dismissed in default after counsel for respondents noted possession stood restored to respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
Through: None.
versus
MAHESH ROHRA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shiven Banga, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
Learned counsel for respondents submits that since possession of the subject property stands restored to the respondents, it appears that appellants have lost interest in this appeal. Since none appears for appellants, the appeal and the accompanying applications are dismissed in default.
DECEMBER 17, 2024/ rk
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2024 at 11:45:11
Kavita Kumar & Anr.
Mahesh Rohra & Ors.
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
