Revision petition concerning tenanted premises; counsel stated the dispute was settled and vacant possession handed over to respondents, and sought withdrawal. The court permitted the petition, along with pending applications, to be dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
RAJ KUMAR JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Bansal and Ms. Arti Sharma, Advocates
versus
RAMESHWARI DEVI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ankush Bansal, Advocate for R-1 to 11
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R % 06.09.2024
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
SEPTEMBER 6, 2024 N/TK
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2024 at 12:40:27
Raj Kumar Jain
Rameshwari Devi
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
