Kumari Urmila Goel v. Shankuntala Devi
Case brief
What is this about?
In RC.REV. 425/2016, this order dismisses the petition in default and for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on multiple calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~47
KUMARI URMILA GOEL .....Petitioner
Through: None
versus
SHANKUNTALA DEVI .....Respondent Through: Appearance not given
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
O R D E R
% 29.08.2024 1. None had appeared on behalf of the petitioner in the first call and none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner even on the second call when the case was called for hearing at 02:50 P.M.
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
AUGUST 29, 2024/ j/abk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2024 at 11:54:39
Kumari Urmila Goel
Shankuntala Devi
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court