Dismissed
Vijay Kumar v. Akshay Goyal
Delhi HCRC.REV./362/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought to withdraw the petition citing a compromise between parties and handover of premises. Court dismissed the petition and pending applications as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~17
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RC.REV. 362/2023
¶4
VIJAY KUMAR ..... Petitioner
¶5
Through: Ms Samkisha Jain, Adv.
¶6
versus
¶7
AKSHAY GOYAL ..... Respondent
¶8
Through: None.
¶9
CORAM:
¶10
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
¶11
- % 14.05.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
¶12
CM APPL. 66140/2023 (additional documents) & CM APPL. 66139/2023 (stay) and RC.REV. 362/2023
¶13
- It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner on instructions that the parties have compromised the disputes and possession of the subject premises has already been handed over by petitioner/tenant to the respondent/landlord. That being so, learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions of her client, seeks permission to withdraw this petition.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Vijay Kumar
- respondent
Akshay Goyal
Coram
AI extract
Girish Kathpalia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court