The petitioners sought permission to withdraw a writ petition after the subject premises possession was restored to them via an out-of-court settlement. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
JAIDEV SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr Anil Sharma, Adv.
versus
M/S LAXMI TRADERS & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R % 02.05.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J MAY 2, 2024/ rk
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/05/2024 at 12:58:25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be withdrawn upon settlement between parties
JAIDEV SINGH & ORS
M/S LAXMI TRADERS & ANR
GIRISH KATHPALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
