Partly allowed

Prem Singh v. Amit Kumar & Ors.

Delhi HC3 Oct 2024RC.REV./248/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju disposed of two applications. Permitting pet. to withdraw appeal against trial court order allowing resp. leave to defend after resp. agreed on evidence timeline vs deleting proforma parties following resp. attesting no objection to withdrawal of same petition.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; Respondents 2 to 5 deleted from party list. Counter-petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Prem Singh Vs Amit Kumar & Ors. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~22

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RC.REV. 248/2022 PREM SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. J.K. Jain, Adv. versus

¶4

AMIT KUMAR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pawan Jakhu, Adv. for R-1.

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶6

O R D E R

¶7

% 03.10.2024

¶8

CM Appl.64050/2023 [Under Section 151 of the CPC]

¶9

Learned Counsel for the Respondents submits that a similar Application was filed by the Petitioner before the learned Trial Court and the Respondents had given their no objection to the said Application. 1.1 Learned Counsel for the Respondents, on instructions, submits that they have no objection if the present Petition against Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 is withdrawn against the said Respondents. He submits that Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 are not tenants, they are merely proforma parties.

¶10

The Application is accordingly allowed. Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 are deleted from the array of parties.

¶11

RC.REV. 248/2022

¶12

The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner impugning the order dated 24.08.2022 [hereinafter referred to as “the Impugned Order”] passed by the learned ARC (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. By the Impugned Order, the Application for Leave to Defend filed by the Respondent was allowed by the learned Trial Court.

¶13

Learned Counsel for the parties submit that the Petitioner’s evidence

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/10/2024 at 15:55:04

¶15

has been closed and now only Respondents evidence remains.

¶16

Learned Counsel for the Respondents submits that although he has five witnesses, he will endeavour to ensure that his evidence is completed in the next four months. Learned Counsel for the Respondents is bound down to the statement.

¶17

Based on this submission, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that he is willing to withdraw the present Petition.

¶18

The Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Both the parties submit that they shall not take unnecessary adjournments before the learned Trial Court.

¶19

Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.

¶20

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

¶21

OCTOBER 3, 2024/r

¶22

Click here to check corrigendum, if any \

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/10/2024 at 15:55:04

Prem Singh v. Amit Kumar & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prem Singh v. Amit Kumar & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

North Delhi Municipal Corporation Vs Ms. Anita Bajaj & Anr.

Bosch Ltd. Vs Director General of Foreign Trade & Anr.

Bosch Chassis System India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Director General of Foreign Trade & Ors.

Chhedi Lal Vs Som Prakash

Smt. Pinki Vs Mst. Rihana Begum

Anand Kumar Vs Vishal Jain and Ors.