Satish Kumar Gosain v. Ritu Sharda
Case brief
What is this about?
Direction to ensure compliance with the order dated 13.08.2024 regarding the filing of an undertaking and payment of user and occupation charges. The order modifies terms for payment and requires personal appearance of the Petitioner.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- RC.REV. 213/2024 SATISH KUMAR GOSAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akshay Bhatia, Adv. versus
RITU SHARDA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Uma Aggarwal, Mr. Pulkit Aggarwal, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
- O R D E R
- % 01.10.2024
CM Appl.57618/2024 [Seeking directions]
- This is an Application filed on behalf of the Respondent in a disposed of matter.
- It is stated that an undertaking as was stated to be filed by the Petitioner in terms of order dated 13.08.2024 has not been filed within two weeks. It is further stated that no use and occupation charges are being paid as were fixed by the Court on the same date.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Satish Kumar Gosain
- respondent
Ritu Sharda
Coram
Tara Vitasta Ganju
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court