This nullifies an eviction order, ruling that the premises fall outside the Delhi Rent Control Act's scope due to lack of specific notification. Consequently, the underlying eviction petition was dismissed.
Eviction order dated 05.08.2016 set aside; eviction petition dismissed. Respondent may initiate recovery proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
RAM BALLABH SAHU & ANR .....Petitioners
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/08/2024 at 12:33:11
premises is located does not fall within the ambit of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 and as such the present eviction petition is not maintainable.
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
AUGUST 22, 2024 Sk/ak/abk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/08/2024 at 12:33:11
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 applies to the tenanted premises located in Swaroop Vihar, Delhi.
Whether the eviction order dated 05.08.2016 was sustainable due to lack of jurisdiction under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
Whether the respondent is entitled to initiate proceedings for recovery of the premises after dismissal of the eviction petition.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Ram Ballabh Sahu & Anr
Sachin Saini
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
