Petitioners sought withdrawal of a revision petition. The Court dismissed the petition and pending applications as withdrawn, and granted the respondent/landlord liberty to recover use and occupation charges in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
PREM SIKRI & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Irfan Ahmed, Adv. with Mr. Ayush Singhal, Adv.
versus
PRAKHAR PRABHAT GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Murari Lal Sharma, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R % 12.11.2024
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
NOVEMBER 12, 2024/SA
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
NOVEMBER 12, 2024/SA
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:22:22
Prem Sikri & Anr.
Prakhar Prabhat Gupta
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
