Revision petition concerning possession of tenanted premises; possession had been taken over by the landlord in execution proceedings, so the petitioner sought withdrawal. The petition and pending applications were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take steps in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
DR N C MANOCHA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate.
versus
SHARIF AHMED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.S. Nizami, Mr. Fahad Nizami & Mr. Saad Sharif, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
SEPTEMBER 26, 2024/ ha
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:34:57
Dr N C Manocha
Sharif Ahmed
Anr.
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
