Dismissed
Asim Kumar v. Anil Aggarwal
Delhi HCRC.REV./135/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner being absent for a long time expressed lack of interest in prosecution. High Court dismissed the petition in default and for want of prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed in default and for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~9
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RC.REV. 135/2018
¶4
- ASIM KUMAR .....Petitioner
¶5
- Through: None
¶6
- versus
¶7
ANIL AGGARWAL .....Respondent
¶8
Through: None CORAM:
¶9
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
¶10
- O R D E R
¶11
- % 29.08.2024
¶12
- Appeared none on behalf of the parties.
¶13
- None is appearing on behalf of the petitioner since long. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecution of the present petition.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Asim Kumar
- respondent
Anil Aggarwal
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Kumar Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court