Dismissed
Neelam Manchanda v. Kanta Jain
Delhi HCRC.REV./120/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Order dismissing a petition in default for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~177
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RC.REV. 120/2023, CM APPL. 22302/2023 & CM APPL.
¶4
- 58323/2023
¶5
NEELAM MANCHANDA .....Petitioner
¶6
Through: None. versus KANTA JAIN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Thukral, Ms. Seema Seth, Ms. Shivani Meena, Mr. Satish Panchal, Mr. Muskan Deswal, Ms. Poorvi Jain & Mr. Suraj Bhan, Advocates.
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
¶8
O R D E R % 05.12.2024
¶9
- None appears for the Petitioner. There was no appearance on behalf of the Petitioner on the last date of hearing as well.
¶10
- Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed in default and for nonprosecution.
¶11
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Neelam Manchanda
- respondent
Kanta Jain
Coram
AI extract
Tara Vitasta Ganju
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court