Dismissed
Ghanshyam v. Sukh Devi
Delhi HCRC.REV./119/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Counsel for parties filed requesting withdrawal of eviction petition. Petitioner was granted six months' possession while paying Rs. 5,000 use-occupation charges.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; eviction quasi-stayed for six months upon payment of Rs. 5,000 monthly charges; liberty for respondent to execute eviction on default.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~31
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RC.REV. 119/2024
¶4
GHANSHYAM ..... Petitioner
¶5
Through: Mr. Ishwar Singh, Advocate
¶6
versus
¶7
SUKH DEVI ..... Respondent
¶8
Through: Mr. Niraj Chaudhry, Advocate
¶9
CORAM:
¶10
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
¶11
CM APPL. 24560/2024 (stay)
¶12
- In furtherance of last order, learned counsel for petitioner on instructions of his client seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to him to continue in possession of the subject premises for a period of six months during which he shall pay use and occupation charges to the respondent at the rate of Rs. 5,000/- per month. Learned counsel for respondent on instructions expresses consent.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
GHANSHYAM
- respondent
SUKH DEVI
Coram
AI extract
GIRISH KATHPALIA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court