Execution petition for enforcement of an arbitral award was withdrawn after counsel stated the award stood fully satisfied; the pending application was disposed of as not surviving.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LTD .....Decree Holder Through: Mr. Dhirendra Negi, Ms. Tanya Tiwari and Mr. Shaurya Rohit, Advs.
versus
NTPC LTD .....Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Adarsh Tripathi, Mr. Vikram Singh Baid and Mr. Ajitesh Garg, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
%
O R D E R 05.08.2024
OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 137/2021
1. Mr. Shaurya, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition as he submits that the award of which execution is sought stands fully satisfied.
2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
EX.APPL.(OS) 973/2021 (direction)
3. The application does not survive for consideration and is disposed of.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
AUGUST 5, 2024/ rb
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:00:13
Larsen and Toubro Ltd
NTPC Ltd
C.Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
