Allowed

M/S S Kumar Construction v. General Manager Telephone Department

Delhi HC18 Dec 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/975/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court allowed an application to extend the mandate of an Arbitral Tribunal. The Court extended the period for concluding proceedings and passing the award from December 8, 2024 to March 7, 2025.

What did the court decide?

Extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate to conclude proceedings and pass the award from 08.12.2024 to 07.03.2025.

M/S S Kumar Construction Vs General Manager Telephone Department — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~44

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 975/2024

¶4

M/S S KUMAR CONSTRUCTION .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar and Mr.Harish Kashyap, Advs.

¶6

Versus

¶7

GENERAL MANAGER TELEPHONE DEPARTMENT .....Respondent Through: Counsel for the respondent.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

¶9

O R D E R % 18.12.2024

¶10

I.A. 48711/2024 (exemption)

¶11

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

Application stands disposed of.

¶13

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 975/2024

¶14

The present petition under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a period of six months for making and publishing the Award.

¶15

Issue notice.

¶16

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent accepts notice. He submits that he has no objection in case the prayer made in the

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/12/2024 at 12:04:28

¶19

present petition is allowed and the time, as sought for on behalf of the petitioner, is extended.

¶20

This Court notes that on earlier occasion also, vide order dated 12.03.2024, the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal was extended by this Court for a period of eight months w.e.f. 09.04.2024 and the said period of eight months has now expired. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that proceedings before the Arbitral Tribunal have already been concluded and the matter is now pending for pronouncement of Award and publication.

¶21

Taking into account the submissions made before the Court, the mandate for concluding the arbitration proceedings and passing the arbitral award is extended for another period of three months, i.e. from 08.12.2024 to 07.03.2025.

¶22

The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶23

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

¶24

DECEMBER 18, 2024/A SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J

¶25

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/12/2024 at 12:04:28

M/S S Kumar Construction v. General Manager Telephone Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S S Kumar Construction v. General Manager Telephone Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Spml Infra Limited Vs Delhi Jal Board

Glowsun Powergen Private Limited Vs Hammond Power Solutions Private Limited

M/S 2768/RAMESH Kumar Shrrevastav Security Agency Vs Employees Staff Insurance Corporation, Delhi

Skills Tech Services Private Limited Vs Manpower Group Services India Private Limited

M/S Rcc Infraventures Ltd. & Ors. Vs M/S Dmi Finance Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

M/S Prasad Construction and Co. Vs Wapcos Ltd.

Sangita Jain & Ors. Vs Sh. Anuj Jain & Ors.

M/S R K Jain and Sons Hospitality Services (P) Ltd. Vs New Delhi Municipal Council

Deepak Chawla Vs Rajeev Chawla & Ors.

Anghaila Housing Private Limited (through Its Md) Vs Santosh Kumar Bagla and Anr.

Rajinder Kaur & Ors. Vs S.Charanjeet Singh & Ors.

Shailender Singh HUF Vs M/S Village People Restaurants LLP

Rajesh Anand & Anr. Vs Seema Chopra & Anr.

D Sharma Construction Vs Northern Railway