The High Court of Delhi allowed an application for extending the mandate of an Arbitral Tribunal by six months to enable the passing of the arbitral award pending in a contract dispute between the parties.
Extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a period of nine months from 31.12.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~76
EMAS EXPRESSWAY PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.K. Chandwani and Mr. Sameer Chandwani, Advocates.
versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gopal Singh, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R
I.A. 48709/2024 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 973/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/12/2024 at 12:51:38
that the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is coming to an end on 31.12.2024, therefore the Petitioner has approached this Court seeking extension of mandate.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
DECEMBER 18, 2024 hsk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/12/2024 at 12:51:38
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended beyond its expiry date to allow completion of the award.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Emas Expressway Private Limited
National Highways Authority of India
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
