This order addressed petitions seeking extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate. Citing Rohan Builders, the Court extended the mandate for one year to accommodate the examination of voluminous documents before pronouncing the award.
Extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a period of one year from today.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66 to 69
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/10/2024 at 14:29:06
versus
DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION .....Respondent
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Mr. Adhish Srivastava and Mr. Hargun Singh Kalra, Advocates
versus
DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Nitin, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R % 22.10.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/10/2024 at 14:29:07
the Claimant has to be examined. He states that since voluminous documents have to be examined and considered, and lengthy examination is going on, the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal may be extended for further one year.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
OCTOBER 22, 2024 S. Zakir
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/10/2024 at 14:29:07
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal may be extended for a further period of one year to allow examination of voluminous documents and pronouncement of the award.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rohan Builders (India) Private Limited v. Berger Paints India LimitedFollowed¶33
Rohan Builders (India) Private Limited v. Berger Paints India Limited, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2494 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
OVERNITE EXPRESS LIMITED
DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
