Petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration Act sought a six-month extension of the arbitral mandate, delay caused by inadvertent filing of extra copies of the statement of claims. The court condoned the delay as an error and granted a final six-month extension.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~65
versus
M/S LENSKART SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED.....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Bajaj, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R
% 04.10.2024 I.A. 41291/2024-EX.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 790/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:25:43
petitioner, the delay needs to be condoned.
JASMEET SINGH, J
OCTOBER 4, 2024/NG
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:25:43
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the arbitral tribunal should be extended under Section 29A to conclude proceedings and pass the award.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Dreamdoor Ventures
M/S Lenskart Solutions Private Limited
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
