Petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking a six-month extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate, citing voluminous records and technical subject matter. The respondent raised no objection; the court allowed the extension and regularised the intervening period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44
PAS DIGITAL PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr Somesh Pandey, Adv. (through VC)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R % 17.09.2024
JASMEET SINGH, J
SEPTEMBER 17, 2024/ sr Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 11:58:14
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended by six months to conclude proceedings and issue the award.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
DAFFODIL SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED
PAS DIGITAL PVT LTD
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
