Petitioner sought extension of the Arbitral Tribunal mandate under Section 29A of the Act. Respondent had no objection. The petition was allowed, extending the mandate by nine months with regularization of the lapsed period.
Mandate of Arbitral Tribunal extended by nine months; period lapsed from 28.08.2023 regularised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
Through: Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Adv.
versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Appearance not given.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:24:51
Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of nine months from today. Further, the period lapsed from 28.08.2023 till date is regularised.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
JANUARY 11, 2024/AR
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:24:51
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended beyond its expiration date.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
VASDEV
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
