Disposed
State Bank of India v. Asha Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi HCO.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/57/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
and connected matters Page 1 of 2 $~30 to 33…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30 to 33
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Appearance:- Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, Standing Counsel for SBI with Ms. Nazia Parveen, Mr. Gourav Dahiya, Mr. Vikas Hooda, Mr. Sumit Kumar, Mr. Sohail Khan, Ms. Rupali Panwar & Mr. Pramod Kumar Sahni, Advocates for Petitioner-SBI in Item Nos. 30 to 33. Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Advocate for Asha Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. in Item Nos. 30 to 33.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 54/2022 and connected matters
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/08/2024 at 12:33:00
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 23.08.2024
Ms. Nazia Parveen, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw these petitions, with liberty to take the grounds available to the petitioner in law, in petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
AUGUST 23, 2024
‘pv’/
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 54/2022 and connected matters
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/08/2024 at 12:33:00
STATE BANK OF INDIA
ASHA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court