Disposed

M/S Enviro Infra Engineers Ltd. v. Government of Chhattisgarh through M/S Public Health Engineering Division

Delhi HC19 Jul 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/535/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 29A sought extension of the arbitrator's mandate in a dispute over Agreement No. 138/DL/2007-08. The respondent raised no objection; proceedings were at the evidence stage. The court extended the mandate by one year from 18.06.2024 and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of the arbitral tribunal extended by one year with effect from 18.06.2024.

M/S Enviro Infra Engineers Ltd. Vs Government of Chhattisgarh… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~31

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 535/2024

¶4

M/S ENVIRO INFRA ENGINEERS LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sahil Garg & Mr. Mithil Malathra, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

GOVERNMENT OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH M/S PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DIVISION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Advocate.

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶8

O R D E R % 19.07.2024

¶9

I.A. 33601/2024 ( for exemption )

¶10

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

The application stands disposed of.

¶12

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 535/2024

¶13

This petition has been filed, under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal, which is in seisin of disputes between the parties arising out of Agreement No. 138/DL/2007-08, entered into between the parties pursuant to a notification of acceptance dated 27.03.2008.

¶14

The mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal was extended, lastly

¶15

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 535/2024

¶16

Page 1 of 2

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:21:11

¶18

by order dated 19.12.2023 in O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 199/2023, until 18.06.2024.

¶19

Although the contentions in the petition are disputed by learned counsel for the respondent, who appears on advance notice, learned counsel states that the respondent has no objection to the extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal.

¶20

I am informed that the proceedings are the stage of evidence. Learned counsel for the parties, therefore, jointly request an extension of the mandate for the period of one year, although the petition seeks an extension of only six months.

¶21

Having regard to the aforesaid facts, at the request of learned counsel for the parties, the mandate is extended by one year, with effect from 18.06.2024. Learned counsel for the parties assure the Court that they will cooperate with the learned Arbitral Tribunal so that the proceedings can be disposed of within this time.

¶22

The petition stands disposed of in these terms.

¶23

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶24

JULY 19, 2024 ‘pv’/

¶25

Page 2 of 2

¶26

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 535/2024

¶27

M/S Enviro Infra Engineers Ltd. v. Government of Chhattisgarh through M/S Public Health Engineering Division

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Enviro Infra Engineers Ltd. v. Government of Chhattisgarh through M/S Public Health Engineering Division

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip Buildcon Limited - Varah Infra Limited (Jv) Vs National Highways Authrity of India

Arun Kumar Rai Vs Protect Ip Solutions LLP & Anr.

Navyug Paper Products & Anr. Vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

M/S Arss Infrastructure Projects Ltd. Vs Steel Authority of India Limited & Anr.

Itd Cementation India Limited Vs Airports Authority of India

Centre for Indian Classical Dances Vs Pujas Shilpkala Pvt. Ltd.

Ms Jas Toll Road Company Ltd. Vs National Highway Authority of India through the Project Director Piu Chitradurga

M/S Sai Boda Hotels Rep. by Its Managing Partner, Mr. Raviraj Boda Vs Oyo Hotels and Homes Pvt. Ltd.

Royal Orchids Vs Kulbir Singh Kohli & Anr.

M/S Fastrack Infrastructure New Delhi Vs Union of India

M/S Enviro Infra Engineers Ltd. Vs Government of Chhattisgarh

M/S Jsp Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Chief Engineer, National Highways Division, Up PWD

Bmw India Private Limited Vs Libra Automotives Private Limited and Others

Kamal Jaswantlal Sheth Vs PNB Housing Finance Limited & Ors.