The Court extended the mandate of the arbitrator by six months under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the matter was at the stage of final arguments.
Extension of the arbitrator's mandate by six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
RITA BHALLA ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Neha Kapoor and Mr. Kaushal Mehta, Advts. (M-8076682348)
versus
M/S LORDS CREATIVE INFRASOLUTIONS PVT LTD
Through: None.
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R % 31.05.2024
I.A. 31371/2024 (for exemption)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/06/2024 at 10:50:38
arguments. The mandate of the ld. Arbitrator is stated to be expiring on 20th June, 2024.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
MAY 31, 2024/ rb/bh
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/06/2024 at 10:50:38
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the arbitrator should be extended as the arbitration proceedings were nearing final arguments and the statutory period was expiring.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rita Bhalla
M/s Lords Creative Infrasolutions Pvt Ltd
Prathiba M. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
