Arbitration mandate extension sought under Section 29A(4); proceedings were at final-argument stage. With respondent's consent, the mandate was extended for six months from 08.05.2024 and the petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
VM CONSTRUCTION ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ankit Gupta Adv.(VC)
versus
UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.N K Aggarwal Adv, SPC for Respondents/ UOI(VC) Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Mr. Akash Saxena, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
O R D E R % 02.05.2024 I.A. 9790/2024 (Exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 349/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2024 at 11:31:24
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
MAY 2, 2024 Pallavi
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2024 at 11:31:24
1 issue framed by the court
Should the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal be extended beyond its expiry on 08.05.2024 to conclude arbitration proceedings?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
VM Construction
Union of India
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
