The Delhi High Court allowed an application for exemption from filing original documents and granted an extension of six months to the mandate of the arbitral tribunal in a commercial dispute.
Exemption from filing originals granted; tribunal mandate extended by six months; all applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~58
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Tyagi, Adv. (M: 9536650566)
versus MATA AMRITANANDAMAYI MATH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Prakhar Deep & Mr. Nitin Sharma, Advs. (M: 9536650566)
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R % 15.04.2024
I.A. 8328/2024(for exemption)
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 303/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:23:08
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
APRIL 15, 2024 dj/rks
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:23:08
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to extend the mandate of the arbitral tribunal by six months.
Whether to allow exemption from filing original documents under Delhi High Court Rules.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sterling and Wilson Pvt. Ltd.
Mata Amritanandamayi Math
Prathiba M. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
