Petition under Section 29A seeking one-year extension of the Arbitrator's mandate; respondent raised no objection, evidence partly concluded and proceedings consigned sine die. Court allowed the petition and extended the mandate by one year from expiry.
Mandate of the Arbitrator extended by one year from the date it expired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
DR. ER. RAJAINDERR JAINA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr Rajesh Aggarwal, Advocate.
versus
MULLER MARTINI INDIA PVT LTD ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Anil Sharma, Mr. Pramod Sehgal, Mr. Anuj Sehgal & Mr. Aman Bhardwaj, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 08.01.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 16:05:37
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
JANUARY 8, 2024 S.Sharma
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 16:05:37
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitrator should be extended by one year under Section 29A to conclude evidence and award?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Er. Rajainderr Jaina
Muller Martini India Pvt Ltd
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
