The Delhi High Court allowed a petition filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court extended the arbitrator's mandate by six months until 30.06.2024 and regularized the prior period.
Mandate extended till 30.06.2024; period till 31.12.2023 regularized.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
VISTAR INTERIOR LLP ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anurag Ojah, Mr. Karan Agarwal, Mr.Subham Kumar, Mr. Vipul Kumar, Advs.
versus
M/S INDIAN CITY PROPERTIES LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rishabh Saxena, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
I.A. 26126/2023 (Exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
O.M.P. (MISC.) 42/2023
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 15:49:40
further period of six months.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
JANUARY 3, 2024 Pallavi
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 15:49:40
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the sole arbitrator can be extended for a further period of six months under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?
Whether the previous extension period ending on 31.12.2023 should be regularized?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
VISTAR INTERIOR LLP
M/S INDIAN CITY PROPERTIES LIMITED
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
