Petition under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act sought extension of the arbitrator's mandate as evidence was ongoing and the respondent was in judicial custody. With parties' consent, the mandate was extended to 31 December 2024, with a caution against unnecessary adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
versus
MR. AJAY KUMAR NAYYAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Abhishek, Advocate.
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
FEBRUARY 07, 2024/ Rahul/dn
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:01:33
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the arbitrator's mandate should be extended given delays caused by the respondent's judicial custody?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs. Dr. Manju Nimesh
Mr. Ajay Kumar Nayyar
Prathiba M. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
