Petitioner sought extension of arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to voluminous record. Respondents had no objection. Court found sufficient cause and extended mandate by one year.
Mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal extended by one year from today; delay period regularized.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39
MEKHALA BAHL .....Petitioner Through: Mr Vedant Kapur, Adv.
versus
VIJENDRA DAULET SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. for R-1 to R-9 (through VC) Mr Ankit Monga, Adv. for R-10 to R- 13.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R % 20.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:19:17
Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of 1 year from today for concluding the arbitral proceedings and passing the final award.
JASMEET SINGH, J
SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 sr Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:19:17
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition for extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate could be allowed given the voluminous record.
Whether sufficient cause has been shown for the delay in concluding the arbitral proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mekhala Bahl
Vijendra Daulet Singh & Ors.
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
