Matrimonial appeal disposed of in terms of a settlement agreement dated 08.12.2023 arrived at during mediation at the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The court found the terms lawful and affirmed the settlement was voluntary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
PRAVEEN BAHL ..... Appellant
Through: Ms Archana Lakhotia, Advocate.
versus
ASHISH BAHL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajat Sehgal with Mr Samyak Jain, Advocates for respondent no.1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 15:42:18
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
terms of the SA.
6. Consequently, the case papers shall be consigned to record.
AMIT BANSAL, J
JANUARY 5, 2024 / tr Click here to check corrigendum, if any
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 81/2023 page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 15:42:18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be disposed of in terms of the settlement agreement dated 08.12.2023 reached between the parties.
PRAVEEN BAHL
ASHISH BAHL
RAJIV SHAKDHER
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
