Disposed

Rakesh Kumar Gupta v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India & Anr.

Delhi HC12 Sept 2024LPA/902/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Acting Chief Justice Gedela dismissed this appeal by preponing the hearing before the learned Single Judge to expedite the disposal of the underlying writ petition regarding the suspension of the appellant's insolvency professional registration.

What did the court decide?

Listing before the learned Single Judge fixed for 14th October, 2024; pre-existing rights and contentions left open.

Rakesh Kumar Gupta Vs Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board… — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~162

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- LPA 902/2024 & CM APPL. 51867/2024, CM APPL. 51868/2024, CM APPL. 51869/2024

¶4

RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA		...	..Ap	pellant
Through:	Mr. Dayan with with	Krishnan, Mr.Me	Sr. ghav	Advocate Gupta,
	Ms.Ayushi	Vats and	Ms.	Sanjeevi
	Seshadri, Advocates.	Mr.Digvi	jay	Singh,
versus

¶5

INSOLVENCY AND BANK Through:	RUPTCY BOARD OF Mr. Dhananjai Jain	INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents and Mr. Bhoop
	Singh, Adv	ocates for
	complainant/CBM C	ontribution LLP.
	Mr.Vikas Mehta	and Ms.Nitika
	Grover, Advocates f	or R-1.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

¶7

¶8

O R D E R 12.09.2024

¶9

Present appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 22^nd August, 2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 11483/2024, wherein the appellant’s (petitioner therein) application bearing CM APPL. No.47677 seeking stay of the order dated 30^th July, 2024 passed by the Disciplinary Committee of the respondent no.1-IBBI suspending the registration of the appellant as an insolvency professional for a period of one year, was dismissed.

¶10

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 01:22:18

¶11

Though the plea of locus as well as limitation is strenuously urged before us, yet keeping in view of the fact that the impugned order is an interim order, this Court disposes of the present appeal by pre-poning the date of hearing before learned Single Judge.

¶12

List before the learned Single Judge on 14^th October, 2024. The parties are directed to complete the pleadings before the next date of hearing.

¶13

This Court requests the learned Single Judge to dispose of the underlying writ petition as expeditiously as possible. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.

¶14

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶15

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶16

SEPTEMBER 12, 2024/ ssc

¶17

Rakesh Kumar Gupta v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Kumar Gupta v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Veterans Forum for Transparency in Public Life through Its General Secretary Vs Union of India & Ors.

Delhi Waqf Board Employees Association & Anr. Vs & Ors.

Jupiter Pharmaceuticals Vs Union of India and Another

Central Board of Secondary Education Vs St. Columbus School and Anr.

Amita Sinha Vs Sneha Srivastava & Ors.

Mrs. Viveka Khanna Vs India Sme Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (Isarc) and Anr.