An appeal filed by Urmila Devi against an order of the Directorate of Education was dismissed at the hearing on 12 February 2024 because the appellant did not appear, and the court opined that she was not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39
versus
DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS
..... Respondents Through: Mrs Avnish Ahlawat, SC, GNCTD with Mr N.K Singh, Ms Laavanya Kaushik, Ms Aliza Alam and Mr Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates Mr. Tadimala Bhaskar Gowtham and Mr Raghav Kumar, Advocates for R3 to R7.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:41:04
is not available.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2024 g.joshi
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:41:04
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors. v. Ravinder SinghReferred¶10
Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors. v. Ravinder Singh in SLP (C) Nos. 12474-75/2019
Pooja Rohilla v. DSSB & Anr.Referred¶10
Pooja Rohilla v. DSSB & Anr.; Neutral Citation No. 2023:DHC:2973-DB
URMILA DEVI
DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION
VIBHU BAKHRU
TARA VITASTA GANJU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
