A bench of two judges disposed of the appeals filed against a Single Judge's order referring a controversy to a larger bench. The court held that the appeals need not be allowed as the writ petitions are now before this Bench for consideration on merits.
The appeals are disposed of; all rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9 & 10
| GEETA SHARMA ..... Appellant |
|---|
| Through: Mr Upamanyu Sharma, Advocate. versus |
| PUBLIC ENTERPRISES SELECTION |
| BOARD & ORS. ..... Respondents |
| Through: Ms Manisha Agrawal Narain, CGSC with Mr Sandeep Singh Somaria, Ms Shivangi Gumber and Ms Khushi |
| Mangla, Advocates for R-1 & 4. |
| Mr Amit Meharia, Mr Abinash Agarwal and Ms Poonam Shekawat, Advocates for R-2/TCIL. Mr Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms Mahima Kapur and Ms Isha Virmani, Advocates for R-3. Ms Meenakshi Midha, Ms Samiksha |
| Gupta and Mr Aditya Parashar, |
| Advocates for R-3. AND |
| + LPA 674/2023 and CM Nos.51139/2023, 51140/2023, 51141/2023, 51142/2023, 65281/2023 and 65282/2023 |
| GEETA SHARMA | ..... Appellant |
|---|---|
| Through: versus |
Mr Upamanyu Sharma, Advocate. |
| PUBLIC ENTERPRISES SEL | ECTION |
| BOARD & ORS. | ..... Respondents |
| Through: | Ms Manisha Agrawal Narain, CGSC |
| with Mr Sandeep Singh Somaria, Ms | |
| Shivangi Gumber and Ms Khushi | |
| Mangla, Advocates for R-1 & 4. | |
| Mr Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate |
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:30:57
with Mr Sanjay Kapur and Mr Devesh Dubey, Advocates for R- 2/BEL and R-3/ Mr S. Damodar Bhattad.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU O R D E R
% 01.02.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:30:57
Judge had erred in referring the questions to the larger bench.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
FEBRUARY 01, 2024 RK (petitioner)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:30:57
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be allowed on the ground that the Single Judge erred in referring the questions to a larger bench.
Whether the contentions of the appellant were not correctly noted in the impugned order.
Whether the appeal requires addressing substantive grievances regarding the Public Enterprises Selection Board procedure.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Geeta Sharma v. Public Enterprises Selection Board & Anr.Referred¶12
W.P.(C) 12516/2022
GEETA SHARMA
PUBLIC ENTERPRISES SELECTION BOARD
VIBHU BAKHRU
TARA VITASTA GANJU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
