LPA appeal by appellants against the Union of India and others was stated by counsel to have become infructuous; the Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
MAHIKAA PATHAK & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Dheeraj Kumar Singh, Mr. Tarun Diwan, Ms. Pyari and Mr. Baldev Pathania, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA ORS & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nishant Gautam, CGSC with Ms. Sanjana Mehrotra and Mr. Vinay Kaushik, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Sanjiv K. Jha, Mr. Sachin Bhatt, Advs. for R-3. Mr. Sanjay Khanna, SC, Ms. Pragya Bhushan, Mr. Karandeep Singh and Mr. Tarandeep Singh, Advs. for R-4.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 05.07.2024
Learned counsel for the appellant states that the present appeal has become infructuous. Accordingly, the same stands disposed of as infructuous.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
JULY 5, 2024
N.Khanna
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 01:33:25
Mahikaa Pathak & Ors.
Union of India Ors & Ors.
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
