Disposed

Gl Litmus Events Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Development Authority

Delhi HC10 May 2024LPA/351/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Acting Chief Justice held that while the Letters Patent Appeal was not maintainable, the nomenclature did not matter. The Court directed the Registry to treat it as a FAO(OS) and ordered the Single Judge to hear and decide the matter finally within three months.

What did the court decide?

Directed Registry to treat LPA as FAO(OS); directed Single Judge to dispose of matter within three months.

Gl Litmus Events Pvt. Ltd. Vs Delhi Development… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~56

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- LPA 351/2024 & CM APPLs.25882-25884/2024

¶4

GL LITMUS EVENTS PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.V. Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijay M. Phadke, Ms. Neeharika Aggarwal amd Mr. Kaustubh Srivastava, Mr. Sidhant Kapur, Mrs. Kaveria Kapur, Mr. Dhananjay Sahai and Mr. Shiv Raj Syal, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate with Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Advocate

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 02.05.2024

¶10

Present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 14^th March, 2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in OMP (COMM.) 189/2018 and further prays for expediting the hearing of the matter as well as conclusion of the matter in a time bound manner, at the earliest.

¶11

Learned senior counsel for the appellant states that he is not seeking pre-ponment of the hearing. He only prays that a direction be passed so that the matter is heard finally on the scheduled date of hearing. He assures and undertakes that the appellant shall not argue for more than one and a half hour.

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2024 at 14:42:49

¶14

Learned counsel for the respondent states that she has no objection to the matter being heard on the next date of hearing. She also assures this Court that respondent shall not argue for more than one hour.

¶15

Though the present appeal is not maintainable as Letters Patent Appeal, yet it is settled law that nomenclature of a proceeding does not matter. Accordingly, this Court directs the Registry to treat the present Letters Patent Appeal as a FAO(OS).

¶16

Further, this Court has no doubt that the learned Single Judge shall make an endeavour on the next date of hearing to expeditiously hear and decide the matter finally in accordance with law, preferably, within three months from the next date of hearing. With the aforesaid request, the present appeal and applications stand disposed of.

¶17

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶18

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J

¶19

MAY 2, 2024 js

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2024 at 14:42:49

Gl Litmus Events Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gl Litmus Events Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Microsoft Corporation Vs Union of India & Ors.

Preeti Singh Vs National Medical Commission & Ors.

Dor Welfare Foundation (Regd.) Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Skylark Multi State Cooperative Group Housing Society Vs Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Anr.

Andy Sehgal and Anr. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Chiranjit Singh Bisht Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.