The appellant by counsel did not press the petition as the respondent's grievance was addressed. The current petition and all pending applications were disposed of. The respondent intended to move a separate application to delete the appellant.
The petition and all pending applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~201
STATE BANK OF INDIA ....Appellant Through: Mr. Ankur Mittal & Ms. Ikshita Parihar, Advs.
Versus
LR BUILDERS PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shivek Trehan & Ms. Bhumika Popli, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA O R D E R % 10.12.2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
DECEMBER 10, 2024 ‘gsr’ Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 01:11:30
State Bank of India
LR Builders Pvt. Ltd.
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
