Dismissed

Smt. Mithlesh v. Sh. Ashok Kumar

Delhi HC24 Jul 2024LPA/163/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal and stay application dismissed. The Delhi High Court held that since two suits involving common parties relate to the same overlapping property, transferring one suit to this Court avoids conflict of orders, deeming the appeal bereft of merit.

What did the court decide?

The present appeal and the pending stay application stand dismissed; the impugned order upholding the transfer is affirmed.

Smt. Mithlesh Vs Sh. Ashok Kumar — Property and Title | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~41

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- LPA 163/2024 & CM APPL. 11476/2024

¶4

SMT. MITHLESH .....Appellant

¶5

Through: Ms. Nupur Sachdeva, Mr. Lokesh Kumar, Mr. Navin Kumar Chittoria and Ms. Sanjana Antil, Advocates (through VC).

¶6

Versus

¶7

SH. ASHOK KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. S.D. Singh, Ms. Kamla Prasad, Ms. Meenu Singh and Mr. Siddharth Singh, Advocates.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

¶9

O R D E R % 24.07.2024

¶10

CM APPL. 11477/2024 (Exemption)

¶11

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of.

¶13

LPA 163/2024 & CM APPL. 11476/2024(Stay)

¶14

Present appeal has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 12^th January, 2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in TR.P.(C.) 1/2019, whereby the Transfer Petition was allowed and the Suit No.CS 110/2016 titled ‘ Ashok Kumar vs. Mohd. Irshad ’, pending before learned ADJ, North-West, Rohini, Delhi, was transferred to this Court to be heard along

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 01:27:26

¶17

with CS(OS) 605/2016 titled ‘ Ashok Kumar vs. Smt. Dayawati ’ pending before this Court on the ground that both the suits relate to the same property.

¶18

Learned counsel for the appellant states that CS (OS) 4097 of 2014 titled Ashok Kumar vs. Mohd. Irshad & Anr. was filed by the respondent seeking permanent injunction against the appellant from forcibly dispossessing the respondent from the disputed land situated at Plot No.18, Khasra No.1170, Kirari Village, Suleman Nagar, Prem Nagar-II, Kirari, Delhi, measuring 150 sq. yds. She states that by way of notification dated 24^th November, 2015, all suits and other proceedings pending before this Court below the value of INR 1 Crores were directed to be transferred to the jurisdictional subordinate Court. Thereafter, by way of an order dated 30^th November, 2015, CS (OS) 4097/2014 was transferred to the Rohini District Court and was renumbered as CS 110/2016 . She avers that another Suit bearing CS (OS) No.605/2016 was filed by the respondent seeking specific performance and execution of the sale deed in respect of a larger area of 283 sq. yds.

¶19

In response to a pointed query, learned counsel for the appellant admits that the land of 283 sq. yds., for which specific performance is sought includes 150 sq. yds., for which suit for permanent injunction has been filed.

¶20

Consequently, as both the suits pertain to the same property and have common parties, this Court is of the view that to avoid conflict of orders, the learned Single Judge has rightly transferred CS(OS) 4097 of 2014 renumbered as CS 110/2016 to this Court.

¶21

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 01:27:26

¶22

Accordingly, the present appeal, being bereft of merits is dismissed. Pending application also stands disposed of.

¶23

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶24

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶25

JULY 24, 2024/ kct

¶26

Smt. Mithlesh v. Sh. Ashok Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Mithlesh v. Sh. Ashok Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagory Innovative Arts Private Limited Vs Union of India & Anr.

Narender Khatri Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Dor Welfare Foundation (Regd.) (Ngo) Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Reenu Singhal & Anr. Vs Satish Maheshwari & Ors.

Justice for All Vs Honble Lieutenent Governor, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs Vikas Chaudhary