Single-paragraph order disposing of the appeal as infructuous because the respondent is already holding an event at the subject site. The question of whether the site is old or new is left open.
Disposed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu and Mr. Hardik Saxena, Advocates along with Mr. Vakeel Khan (AE) through Video Conferencing for R-1. Mr. Raghvendra Upadhyay, Panel Counsel, GNCTD with Ms. Purnima Jaini and Mr. Vaibhav Tripathi, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Amit Kumar and Mr. Jai Parkash, Advocates for R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 08.10.2024
Since Respondent No.3 is already holding Ramleela at Indra Park, Jalebi Chowk, Sultan Puri, Delhi (‘subject site’), the appeal is disposed of as infructuous. However, the issue as to whether the site in question is an old site or a new site is left open.
CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
OCTOBER 8, 2024/kks
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 01:37:45
Rahul Dhaka Vikas Society Regd
Delhi Development Authority
Tushar Rao Gedanla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
