The High Court disposed of the income-tax appeal as rendered infructuous since the underlying additions were deleted by the Tribunal based on Settlement Commission orders which remain unrectified.
The appeal is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2
.....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Ms. Easha Kadian and Mr. G. Ranjan, Advs.
versus
DELHI ART GALLERY PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarun Gulati, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rony O. John, Mr. Piyush Swami and Ms. Shruti Kulkarni, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
%
O R D E R 01.08.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 11:51:21
the appeal is disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
YASHWANT VARMA, J
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
AUGUST 1, 2024 ns
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 11:51:21
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2
Delhi Art Gallery Pvt. Ltd.
Yashwant Varma
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
