The appellant conceded that the issue in the appeal had already been decided by the Supreme Court. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the appeal and closed the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Appellant Through: Ms Nivedita Nain and Ms Asha Gopalan Nain, Advocates
versus
CONTINENTAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION (CEC) .....Respondent Through: Mr Kunal Kher, Mr Amit George and Mr Paras Sehgal, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 05.08.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
AUGUST 5, 2024 /ds
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/08/2024 at 11:16:28
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal survives in light of a Supreme Court decision addressing the same issue.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
National Highways Authority of India v. Hindustan Construction Company LtdReferred¶9
National Highways Authority of India v. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 802 · Who else cites this
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
CONTINENTAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION (CEC)
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
