Dismissed

Ms Utpala Mukherjee v. Aeromarine Logistics Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Delhi HC5 Sept 2024FAO(OS)/75/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order records a successful mediation settlement. Upon satisfying requirements of CPC Order XXIII Rule 3, the Court dismissed the appeal, vacated interim orders, and decreed the underlying suit in terms of the executed settlement agreement.

What did the court decide?

The present appeal and pending application are disposed of and the underlying suit is decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 04th September, 2024.

Ms Utpala Mukherjee Vs Aeromarine Logistics… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~5.

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- FAO(OS) 75/2022 & CM APPL. 29171/2022

¶4

MS UTPALA MUKHERJEE .....Appellant Through: Mr. Praful Jindal, Adv. versus AEROMARINE LOGISTICS PVT LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Sandipa Bhattacharjee, Mr. Shivam Singh Advocates for R-5

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

¶6

O R D E R % 05.09.2024

¶7

Present appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 31^st May, 2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in I.A. No. 1560/ 2022 in CS(OS) 49/2022 whereby the application for interim relief filed by the appellantplaintiff was dismissed.

¶8

The present matter was referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. Mediation in the present case has been successful through the efforts of Mr. Avneesh Garg, Mediator.

¶9

Today, a Settlement Agreement dated 04^th September, 2024 executed between the parties has been received from the Registry. Learned counsel for the parties pray that the underlying suit be decreed and the present appeal be disposed of in terms of the mediated settlement.

¶10

It is pertinent to mention that the Supreme Court in Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. (P) Ltd. , (2010) 8 SCC 24 while dealing with Section 89 of the CPC has observed that the

¶11

This is a digitally signed order.

¶12

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2024 at 14:29:57

¶13

settlement agreement will have to be placed before the Court for recording it and in disposing of the suit in its terms, the Court should apply the principle of Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC and make a decree in terms of the settlement in regard to the subject matter of the suit, to make such settlement effective.

¶14

This Court is satisfied that the compromise between the parties contained in the aforesaid Settlement Agreement satisfies the requirements of Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. The compromise contained in the aforesaid Settlement Agreement is lawful and therefore, this Court does not find any impediment in decreeing the underlying suit in terms of the aforesaid Settlement Agreement.

¶15

The statements/ undertakings given by the learned counsel for the parties are accepted by this Court and the parties are held bound by the same. The interim orders, if any, stands vacated.

¶16

Consequently, the present appeal and the pending application are disposed of and the underlying suit is decreed in terms of the aforesaid Settlement Agreement dated 04^th September, 2024 executed between the parties, which is marked as Ex. C-1. The Registry of this Court is directed to prepare a decree sheet in terms thereof.

¶17

List the matter on 01^st October, 2024 before the Joint Registrar for release of the money deposited in this Court.

¶18

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶19

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶20

SEPTEMBER 5, 2024

¶21

N.Khanna

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2024 at 14:29:57

Ms Utpala Mukherjee v. Aeromarine Logistics Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms Utpala Mukherjee v. Aeromarine Logistics Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arun Chopra & Anr. Vs Neeraj Kainth & Ors.

Harveen Singh Chadha @ Lovely & Anr. Vs Balveen Singh Chadha @ Ricky

Bakshish Singh Chandhok and Ors. Vs Bhavjot Singh Chandhok

Shefali Varma Vs Meenakshi Varma & Ors.

Atul Jaggi Vs Ajab Lal Jaggi & Ors.

Rajiv Malhotra Vs Sushma Bhambri & Ors.

Shutham Electric Ltd. Vs Vaibhav Raheja & Anr.

Amita Sinha Vs Sneha Srivastava & Ors.

Wazirpur Jj Colony Association Vs the Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. & Ors.

Gagan Jain & Ors. Vs Bank of Baroda and Ors.

Anil Kumar Garg Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Shib Das Sarkar & Anr. Vs Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Ors.

Sh Birendar Singh Vs the Registrar of Co-Operative Societies & Anr.

Lipika Sud and Anr. Vs Hemant Sud & Anr.