Appeal against an order of 23 December 2011 in a partition suit. By consent, the impugned order was set aside, with the Court clarifying that its interim order of 7 December 2023 would continue until disposal of the partition suit by the learned Single Judge. Appeal disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23.
Through: Mr. Rajat Navet and Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Advs. versus
PURI INVESTMENTS & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath; Mr. Vimal Kumar Nagrath; Ms. Divya Lal; Mr. Arjun Gaur; Mr. Vinod Kumar; and Mr Rajat Gupta;
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R % 15.05.2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
MAY 15, 2024
N.Khanna
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 00:02:27
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order dated 23.12.2011 should be set aside by consent.
Jai Rattan Bhalla & Anr
Puri Investments & Ors
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
