Disposed

Netherlands India Communications Enterprises Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.

Delhi HC5 Nov 2024FAO(OS)/154/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal against a Single Judge's order restoring a 2011 arbitration-related OMP after condoning a 365-day delay. The appellant, during arguments, sought only expedition of the pending OMP's disposal instead. The Division Bench found this fair and reasonable, disposed of the appeal and directed the Single Judge to decide the matter preferably within three months, without commenting on merits and lea

What the court decided

AI extract

Netherlands India Communications Enterprises Ltd. Vs Union of… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~36

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- FAO(OS) 154/2024 & C.M.Nos.64646-64649/2024

¶4

NETHERLANDS INDIA COMMUNICATIONS ENTERPRISES LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr.Debashish Moitra with Mr.Siddhant Kumar Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Arnav Kumar, CGSC with Mr.Aakash Meena, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

¶5

O R D E R % 05.11.2024

¶6

Present appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 16^th August, 2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in OMP No.424/2011 whereby the learned Single Judge condoned a delay of 365 days in filing the restoration application and restored OMP No.424/2011.

¶7

After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant would be satisfied in the event this Court were to expedite the hearing and disposal of OMP No.424/2011.

¶8

Keeping in view the fact that OMP No.424/2011 has been pending since 2011, this Court is of the view that the request made by learned counsel for the appellant is fair and reasonable.

¶9

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 00:00:15

¶10

Accordingly, the present appeal along with the applications is disposed of with a direction to the learned Single Judge to decide OMP No.424/2011 as expeditiously as possible preferably within three months from today. This Court clarifies that it has not commented on the merits of the controversy. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.

¶11

MANMOHAN, CJ

¶12

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶13

NOVEMBER 5, 2024 KA

¶14

Netherlands India Communications Enterprises Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Netherlands India Communications Enterprises Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Roshni Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ashish Khanna & Anr.

Kusum Jain Thru Her Power of Attorney Holder Sh Rajeev Jain Vs Suresh Chand Jain

Vaibhav Ahuja Vs Chandni Chowdhary and Ors.

Raman Arora & Anr. Vs Shri Mohan Lal Thakur & Ors.

Anoop Sharma Vs Commonwealth Games Village Apartment Owners Association & Ors.

Anoop Sharma Vs Commonwealth Games Village Apartment Owners Association & Ors.

Amit Tara & Ors. Vs Deepak Tara & Ors.

Chandni Fazli Vs Razia Sultana and Ors.

Manish Raghav Vs Union of India & Anr.

Shiva Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Vs Northern Railway

Sameer Bahadur Vs Union of India & Anr.

Vinod Kumar Jain Vs Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Anr.

Shanti Mahato Vs Gulshan Verma & Anr.

M/S Pashmina Exporters and Manufacturers Association and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.