Where the trial court has heard final arguments in the suit and reserved its orders, an appeal against an interlocutory order on Order XXXIX CPC applications is not decided; the appellate court considers it inappropriate to pass any order at that stage and disposes of the appeal without adjudicating the issues.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 12.09.2024
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
SACHIN DATTA, J
SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 RK Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 23:55:15
1 issue framed by the court
Should the interim injunction appeal be decided while final arguments in the suit are already heard and judgment reserved?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Raftaar Productions Ltd.
Shri Saurabh Suman
Vibhu Bakhru
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
