Disposed

Sumantu Virmani v. Upinderjit Khurana

Delhi HC10 Dec 2024FAO (COMM)/197/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act against dismissal of a Section 34 challenge to an arbitral award. The parties agreed to settle: appellant to pay Rs.23 lacs in two instalments, withdraw FIR and cooperate in its quashing; appeal disposed accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed on settlement terms: Rs.23 lacs payable in two instalments; award unenforceable on payment; FIR withdrawal undertaking.

Sumantu Virmani Vs Upinderjit Khurana — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~3

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

FAO (COMM) 197/2024 and CM APPL. 57598/2024 SUMANTU VIRMANI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ankit Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Varun Nischal, Ms. Saira Tagra and Mr. Aditya Chauhan, Advocates with appellant in person.

¶4

versus

¶5

UPINDERJIT KHURANA .....Respondent Through: Appearance not received.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 10.12.2024

¶7

The present appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as the Act) seeks to assail the order dated 20.07.2024 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial)-03, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in O.M.P.(COMM) No.3/2023. Vide the impugned order, the learned Trial Court has rejected the appellant’s application under Section 34 of the Act, wherein a challenge was laid by him to the arbitral award dated 06.09.2022.

¶8

After arguing the matter at some length, learned senior counsel for the appellant, on instructions from the appellant, who is present in Court, submits that in order to bring quietus to the entire dispute between the parties, the appellant is willing to pay an amount of Rs.23 lacs to the respondent in two instalments payable on or before 31.03.2025 in lieu of the awarded amount. The said suggestion is acceptable to the learned counsel for the respondent. The appellant also undertakes not to pursue the FIR

¶9

This is a digitally signed order.

¶10

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 11:55:49

¶11

already lodged against the respondent and assures the Court that in case, it is required he will cooperate with the respondent in filing a petition to seek quashing of the said FIR.

¶12

In the light of the aforesaid, we, accordingly, dispose of the appeal by taking on record the appellant’s statement that he will pay a total sum of Rs.23 lacs to the respondent in two instalments i.e. a sum of Rs.13 lacs and Rs.10 lacs, with the first instalment of Rs.13 lacs being payable on or before 31.01.2025 and second instalment of Rs.10 lacs being payable on or before 31.03.2025. The appellant will also submit an application to the SHO at the concerned Police Station, Haridwar where the FIR has been lodged by him informing the police about his settlement with the respondent. Further he will render all cooperation to the respondent in seeking quashing of the said FIR. An affidavit of undertaking in this regard will be filed by the appellant within 10 days.

¶13

While disposing of the appeal, alongwith the pending application in the aforesaid terms, making it clear that on the appellant paying the aforesaid amount of Rs. 23 lacs in the terms noted hereinabove, the impugned award dated 06.09.2022 will no longer be enforceable. We further make it clear that upon receipt of the aforesaid amount of a sum of Rs.23 lacs from the appellant, the respondent will not be entitled to raise any other dispute or claim against the appellant in respect of the suit property.

¶14

REKHA PALLI, J

¶15

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

¶16

DECEMBER 10, 2024/ uk

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 11:55:49

Sumantu Virmani v. Upinderjit Khurana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumantu Virmani v. Upinderjit Khurana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anjali Sharma Vs Amit Kumar

M/S Unissi India Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Highway Construction Co. & Ors.

Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. Vs Aghum Bahl & Anr.

M/S Shree Acids and Chemicals Ltd. & Anr. Vs M/S Asrec (India) Ltd.

Poonam Sehrawat Vs Anoop Sehrawat & Anr.

Sh Anoop Sehrawat and Anr. Vs Smt Poonam Sehrawat and Anr.