The appellants contention regarding unreadable documents was dismissed they were found legible. The appeal pending applications were dismissed in default as the appellant expressed lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
Petition and pending applications dismissed in default; exemptions allowed subject to exceptions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
BAL KRISHAN ..... Appellant
Through: None. versus
RAJINDER KUMAR NAGPAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr N. Mahabir, Mr P.C. Arya, Ms Noopur Biswas and Mr Udit Gupta, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R % 23.01.2024
CM Nos.3811/2024 and 3812/2024
FAO (COMM) 13/2024 CM APPL. 3810/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:52:31
The said copies are legible. He states that he is also carrying the original of the said documents. It does appear that an incorrect statement was made by the learned counsel for the appellant that the documents filed by the respondent are not legible.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
JANUARY 23, 2024 RK
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:52:31
Bal Krishan
Rajinder Kumar Nagpal
Vibhu BakHRu
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
