Single-judge order dismissing a review petition and a connected stay application. The court held that no apparent error exists on the face of the record regarding the prior dismissal of an appeal.
Review Petition 453/2024 and CM App. 71214/2024 set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62
S. GURDEEP SINGH THROUGH LRS .....Appellant
versus
S. SURJIT SINGH AND ANR .....Respondents Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R % 05.12.2024
CM APPL. 71215/2024 (exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
This application stands disposed of.
REVIEW PET. 453/2024 & CM APPL. 71214/2024 (stay)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/12/2024 at 11:43:53
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
DECEMBER 5, 2024/ vp
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/12/2024 at 11:43:53
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Review Petitioner has established any apparent error on the face of the record warranting exercise of review power.
Whether the review petition is maintainable given the lack of apparent error in the impugned order dismissing the appeal.
S. GURDEEP SINGH THROUGH LRS
S. SURJIT SINGH AND ANR
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
