Allowed

Shri Dharam Vir v. Shri Om Parkash Dhamija & Anr.

Delhi HC4 Apr 2024EX.P./98/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Execution petition filed to execute a consent decree regarding joint usage of property. The court permitted the decree-holder to construct a staircase for common terrace access at their own cost, noting that judgment debtors had no objection.

What did the court decide?

Decree-holder permitted to construct staircase at own cost and risk, with responsibility for permissions and safety.

Shri Dharam Vir Vs Shri Om Parkash Dhamija & Anr. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

EX.P. 98/2022& EX.APPL.(OS) 3754/2022 SHRI DHARAM VIR ..... Decree Holder

¶4

Through: Ms. Urfee Haider, Adv.

¶5

Versus

¶6

SHRI OM PARKASH DHAMIJA & ANR. ..... Judgement Debtor

¶7

Through: Mr. Dhruv Pande and Mr. Jishnu Bhardwaj, Advs.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R

¶9

% 04.04.2024

¶10

This is a petition filed under Order XXI Rule 10 of the CPC seeking execution of the Consent Decree dated 28.10.2014 passed by this Court in CS (OS) 2286/2010.

¶11

The parties had arrived at a settlement, wherein the portion marked as B in the site plan was to be in common usage of the decree-holder and the judgment debtor Nos. 1 and 2.

¶12

It is stated by Mr. Haider, learned counsel for the decree holder that in order to go to the terrace, which is in joint use and occupation of the decreeholder and the judgment debtor Nos. 1 and 2, a staircase needs to be made from the portion marked as B to a similar site on the first floor.

¶13

Mr. Pande, learned counsel for the judgment debtors states that there is no such direction in the Consent Decree, but in order to put a quietus to the matter, the judgment debtors are not objecting to the same.

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 11:53:57

¶15

For the said reasons, it is directed that the decree-holder shall be permitted to make a staircase from the portion marked as B to the corresponding portion on the first floor to use the common terrace, at his own costs and risk.

¶16

It will be the responsibility of the decree-holder to take all permissions prior to the construction.

¶17

In addition, the decree-holder shall also ensure the safety and security of the building as well as its occupants.

¶18

The judgment debtors have no objection to signing any document and will extend all cooperation in this regard.

¶19

The note handed over by the judgment debtors in Court is taken on record.

¶20

The execution petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶21

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶22

APRIL 4, 2024/NG

¶23

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 11:53:57

Shri Dharam Vir v. Shri Om Parkash Dhamija & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Dharam Vir v. Shri Om Parkash Dhamija & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gunjan Recreations Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs M/S Aditya Birala Housing Finance Ltd.

Phaethon International Ag Vs Steel Authority of India Limited

Forgings Private Limited ( in Liquidation) through, Sajeve Bhushan Deora, Liquidator Vs Pivotal Infrastructure Private Limited & Ors.

M/S Moonwalk Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S S R Construction & Ors.

Rasmala Trade Finance Fund Vs Raman Gupta

Punj Lloyd Ltd. through Liqudiator Vs Dy. Chief Engineer (Construction-Ii) North Western Railway